bodhi auto-obsoleting disabled?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:28:44 +0200
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:53:24 -0600, Kevin wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 10:27:05 +0200
> > Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > 
> > > Caution, everyone!
> > > 
> > > It seems that bodhi no longer obsoletes update tickets when
> > > submitting newer ones. Currently, there are several competing
> > > test-updates, where a ticket exists for an old and a new release.
> > > But only the older release is found in the repo actually due to a
> > > bug in bodhi (either regression or still unfixed, but it has been
> > > reported long ago). E.g. libchamplain and libinfinity.
> > 
> > Auto obsoletes haven't been disabled... it looks like the old
> > libchamplain had a stable request already on it, 
> 
> No, you're misreading things:
> 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libchamplain-0.9.1-1.fc15
> * bodhi - 2011-04-03 15:34:42
> This update has been submitted for testing by pbrobinson. 
> * bodhi - 2011-04-09 12:44:46
> This update has been submitted for stable by pbrobinson. 
> 
> 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libchamplain-0.10.0-1.fc15
> * bodhi - 2011-04-05 15:18:39
> This update has been submitted for testing by tbzatek. 
> * bodhi - 2011-04-11 09:18:46
> This update has been submitted for stable by tbzatek. 

So I am. Odd. ;( 

> Bad, bad, bad. No response to my comments inside those bodhi tickets.
> Meanwhile, both packages have been requested to be pushed to stable,
> but one of them has never been in updates-testing.

Yeah, I am going to mail them both, but perhaps we should revoke both
requests until they sort it out. ;( 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110411/a18d0e76/attachment.bin