c-icap

Trever L. Adams trever.adams at gmail.com
Mon Aug 22 13:38:06 UTC 2011


On 08/21/2011 06:56 PM, Nathan Owe wrote:
> I am currently working on packaging c-icap I get the following error using rpmlint:
> rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64/result/c-icap-0.1.6-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm 
> c-icap.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib
> c-icap.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/c-icap-libicapapi-config
> c-icap.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/c-icap-config
>
> I know what they mean. The first error is true because during the configure process I noticed that it gave a warning that zlib is needed for the program's internal file-type recognizer to work.
>
> Now the last two, well can the last two actually be development files? I never thought a binary file would be considered a development file. I am asking that since I wanted to make sure there wasn't an error in the rpmlint's output.
Nathan, as I am developing a content classification module for c-icap
(which when used with Squid or other ACLs makes a great Internet filter)
I have some rpm spec files I use to build c-icap. I do not have the time
to be the maintainer of the package for Fedora. However, if you would
like I can provide you with my spec file and the packaging shell script
I use. You would be more than welcome to grab it and use it provided the
official spec has all references to me removed.

If you are interested, let me know.

Trever
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110822/6c832d72/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list