ARPACK - Change of upstream

[Thomas Spura]

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, TASAKA Mamoru
<mtasaka at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Jussi Lehtola wrote, at 12/12/2011 03:46 AM +9:00:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Recently, a collaboration has picked up the pieces and started
>> maintaining a new fork of ARPACK [2].
>>
>
> AFAIK forking or renaming will always require new review request.
>
> e.g.
> fork; util-linux -> util-linux-ng
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252046
>
> rename: again util-linux-ng -> util-linux
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667416

But what when the name doesn't change?
As Jussi described it, it's the same "project" just a different
upstream and nothing rewritten from scratch.
So it should be ok...

Greetings,
   Tom