heads-up: systemtap-sdt-devel rebase in rawhide

[Josh Stone]

On 01/19/2011 02:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> fche at redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) writes:
>> I agree.  It's not a great situation, but local GCC/C++ experts have
>> found no better way to type-analyze the parameters, to ensure their
>> safe passage to the tool.  (Our testing shows <limits> is not
>> offensive to other C++ apps we've seen.)
> 
> What I was more worried about was what happens when sdt.h is included in
> plain C code.  Whatever you think of C++ apps that don't play nice with
> <limits>, such a complaint is unlikely to impress authors of plain C
> apps.

That bit is only present within "#ifdef __cplusplus".  The "#else" part
for C uses a different trick including __builtin_choose_expr().

Josh