BTRFS: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

Michael Cronenworth mike at cchtml.com
Wed Jul 13 21:54:44 UTC 2011


Farkas Levente wrote:
> if you said that this's the current state of btrfs than it's not ready
> as a default fs for f16. so please postpone it at least to f17.

If f16 gets kernel 3.1 (or backported stuff into 3.0), IMHO there is no 
reason to slip it one release.


More information about the devel mailing list