systemd vice SysV/LSB init systems - what next ?
Adam Williamson
awilliam at redhat.com
Thu Jul 21 15:51:59 UTC 2011
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:53 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote:
> I'd suggest something along the lines of 'sorry, but
> maintaining two
> officially-supported init systems side-by-side is an excessive
> burden on
> package maintainers and quality assurance, so we won't be
> doing it'.
> It's hard to go wrong by just politely saying what you mean.
>
> But as someone who is maintaining his own package...
>
> Won't I have to maintain two different init system support files
> for both systemd based distros and "all the other Linux and Unix
> distros"
> I also run on?
Well, yes. But when I say 'maintainer' I'm talking about Fedora project
package maintainers, not upstream developers.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw
http://www.happyassassin.net
More information about the devel
mailing list