Guidance on hulahop epoch usage

Tue Jun 7 18:02:36 UTC 2011

On 06/07/2011 07:04 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:

> I agree with you but this bug is a bit special in that it is several
> versions out of date. If this was F14 or even F13, the Epoch bump would be
> good. But adding a bump for a mistake on a F10 branch seems unnecessary now.

Even though that makes the issue less prominent, ignoring it is not
something I'd do in packages I maintain, FWIW.