powertop2 vs powertop
Eric Sandeen
sandeen at redhat.com
Mon Mar 14 18:13:18 UTC 2011
On 3/14/11 1:03 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 06:53:31PM +0100, jan.klepek wrote:
>
> > In not so recent past, powertop2 alpha has been released [1] and it is
> > currently in version 1.97. It is usuable and I was thinking about
> > packaging it for Fedora. However, there is already "old" powertop.
> > So I will have to package it as powertop2 because it is completely
> > different tool.
> > Does it have sense to package it as powertop2? Or should rather powertop
> > package maintainer update powertop package with new sources (even when
> > they are considered as alpha)?
>
> Is powertop1 going to continue to be updated ? I would assume not,
> and having both in the archive is just going to cause confusion.
>
> What's wrong with waiting for the non-alpha version, and then updating
> the existing powertop package ?
>
> Dave
>
Er, isn't it already built for fedora? I think the migration
is well in hand. :)
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/powertop/1.97/
-Eric
More information about the devel
mailing list