F15's /usr/include/rpc has disappeared; <netdb.h> uncompilable

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Sat May 7 00:51:05 UTC 2011


On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 19:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> writes:
> > sounds like a perfectly good reason to file negative karma on the
> > 'revised' update, then. Really - if you think the update is causing
> > significant problems, file negative karma, raise a stink about it. We
> > don't have to accept the update.
> 
> Done, but given that the glibc maintainers have already stated their
> intention to walk away from that update and file a new one so they can
> ignore the bad karma on it, I don't have a lot of faith that I wasn't
> wasting my time.

to be fair, that was just to circumvent the bodhi issue I noted earlier.
I don't think they actually want to ignore negative feedback on the
*new* update, they just don't want negative feedback from the old update
considered as applying to the new one. Which is reasonable.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the devel mailing list