Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...

"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" johannbg at gmail.com
Mon Nov 21 22:22:56 UTC 2011


On 11/21/2011 10:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> This has come up nearly every release cycle.  Problem is that nobody can seem to agree on what an appropriate "sign of life" would be, no has made a serious FESCo proposal for a contrived sign of life.
>
> I don't think anybody disagrees (well maybe KKoffler) that unmaintained software should be discovered and ejected from the distro, the entirety of the problem lies how to discover (as well as side issues about what to do about maintainers that are active for one package, but completely ignore 3 others, etc…)

Well comes logically to me that at least the maintainer would be 
stripped of those packages he is ignoring.

>
> So if you are serious about wanting this fixed, draft a proposal, figure out who's going to do the coding work, and bring it to FESCo.

I would think this work directly falls under releng jurisdiction ( given 
that releng is ultimately responsible for the bits being shipped to end 
users and at the same time are the once most familiar with the inner 
packaging process ) in accordance with what FPC or FESCO decide.

How does FPC handle packagers that violate the packaging guidelines?

JBG


More information about the devel mailing list