Review swaps

[Thomas Spura]

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:18:55 -0600
Jerry James wrote:

> The first two should be dead easy.  From Fedora's point of view,
> they're just data packages; no libraries or binaries are involved.
> The third one is a bit complex.  I had to tweak a lot of pathnames to
> match existing Fedora practice, as well as do some violence to the
> Makefiles to eliminate unused direct shared library dependencies and
> undefined non-weak symbols.  So please swap me for 2 easy and one hard
> review of your own. :-)

Do you consider this an easy or a hard one: ;)
espresso - Extensible Simulation Package for Research on Soft matter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740846

I'll try to have a look at your hard one, but I have no ocalm
experience yet. So maybe I'll just review your first one - we'll see ;)

	Tom