Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft
jwboyer at gmail.com
Tue Apr 3 19:13:51 UTC 2012
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:58:11 -0700
> Brendan Conoboy <blc at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 04/03/2012 09:07 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > From a koji perspective, there really isn't much benefit to step 2.
>> > What needs to happen is the RPMs from the secondary hub need to be
>> > copied to the primary in the correct NVR directories in the hub's
>> > storage. That can happen in the background for quite a bit, but at
>> > some point the hub would need to be taken offline to sync up the
>> > last few builds, and then switch the builders over.
>> > Having a staging hub just means you have to copy and move the
>> > builders twice. This is mostly due to how koji builders can only
>> > talk to one hub at a time and one hub only.
>> Where do you envision the builders being in this scenario? I see the
>> steps being something like this:
>> 1. SA builders and/or hub are located outside PHX.
>> 2 option a. Builders come up in PHX, hub stays in original location.
>> 2 option b. Staging hub comes up in PHX, builders stay in original
>> location. 3. Both staging hub and builders come up in PHX
>> 4. When appropriate move from staging hub to primary hub.
> As i see it the Secondary arch will continue to run as normal.
> we will get new build hardware for use in PHX, it will be brught up
> and added to koji behind the scenes we will be importing the matching
Who is "we" in this scenario. It's the responsibility of the SA team
to provide hardware for builders, and I don't see promotion to PA as
grounds for someone other than the SA team purchasing it. Basically,
"we" here should not be "the Fedora project".
More information about the devel