RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

[Brendan Conoboy]

On 04/23/2012 12:54 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> So FESCo is in otherwords saying that other installers and even
> installing methods ( think like the distribution would be flashed to a
> device in the maybe not to distant future instead of being installed in
> the traditional sense as we know it to be ) are not allowed or otherwise
> considered to be part of the distribution should some community members
> want to writer and or package an alternative installer to ship and use
> on their spin?

It's not about anaconda specifically, it's about having a standard 
installer experience across all PAs to the extent technically sensible. 
  Maybe something else will supplant anaconda in time.

-- 
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc at redhat.com