RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 04/23/2012 08:14 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
>> >  Fesco is saying that if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda,
>> >  you must support installing via Anaconda. It's legitimate for you to
>> >  also have other install mechanisms, and hardware that's incapable of
>> >  supporting Anaconda installs isn't required to have them.
> Thanks for the clarification.  I just wanted to make sure I understood that.

FESCo should make that more clear in the requirements but even if they 
do they still make secondary architecture solely depended upon the will 
and the time of someone within the "Installer team" to implement the 
solution required to install Fedora for their architecture before they 
can become primary architecture.

That can mean from never to having to wait for several release cycles 
before becoming primary architecture for the distribution.

 From my point of view that makes absolutly no sense and the 
requirements should be refactored to require an working installation 
method...

JBG