Mass changes to packaging

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 13:24:53 -0400,
   Tom Lane <tgl at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>which should not do anything on an update.  It would auto-enable if
>you were installing the package when it was previously not present,
>but that isn't what you're describing.  File a bug maybe?

I'll need to keep better track. There are some cases where I do a reinstall. 
If there is version conflict for an update, I will sometimes remove the 
conflicting packages in order to test the update. Then later I'll put back 
removed packages after they have been updated so as not to conflict 
any more. So I might be seeing a combination of this case and upgrades 
between Fedora releases.

I'm still hoping that the new feature will let me set a policy of nothing 
new getting installed should be on by default.