Mass changes to packaging

[Scott Schmit]

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > He's not ignoring it, he's saying that on F18+, the expansion of
> > %systemd_post_enable should be exactly the same as the expansion of
> > %systemd_post, i.e. not enabled by default and honoring whatever
> > presets are set for the spin.
> >
> > This approach allows for spec files to be synced between all Fedora
> > branches and generate the appropriate scriptlets for each release when
> > built.
> 
> This optimizes the migration path at the cost of making the final
> state ugly; I'm not sure that is a good bargain.

Once F20 rolls out and F17 goes EOL, maintainers can simply
s/systemd_post_enable/systemd_post/ and then things won't be so ugly (or
final).

-- 
Scott Schmit
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4104 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120828/4f377675/attachment.bin>