Summary/Minutes for Wednesday's FESCo meeting (2012-12-05)

[Josh Boyer]

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Also, there was dissent already in the "auto-approving" of leaf-features
>>> during the meeting discussion so I am not sure that auto-accepting of
>>> Features in general given a lack of response is ever going to actually
>>> happen.  I personally wouldn't vote for it.
>
>
> This proposal entirely avoids discussion of "leaf-features", "self contained
> features" or "complex features with system-wide impact" since there will
> never by any reasonable metrics you can apply to decide. If you can't decide
> what feature you are dealing with, how you want to judge if FESCo should be
> approving it or not.
>
> If some FESCo member thinks that is should be approved by FESCo, s/he still
> has the power to open ticket for FESCo meeting. The same power as other
> Fedora community members.
>
> Actually I would be very interested to hear why there should not be
> "auto-approving". Please enlighten me.

I explained my reasoning in the part of the email you cut off in your
reply.

josh