Bodhi critical path updates policy adjustment

[Kevin Kofler]

Adam Williamson wrote:
> We'll keep it around, but I'll update the wiki pages to note that it's
> kinda 'dormant' for now. I'm hoping that with Bodhi 2.0 we'll be able to
> re-design the process and utilize proventesters in a better way.

How about just requiring 1 proventester +1 *or* 2 regular +1s instead of the 
current "any 2" or the previous "1+1" rule? A proventester should be 
trusted, so why require a second +1 if the first one was from a 
proventester?

        Kevin Kofler