[Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
Adam Williamson
awilliam at redhat.com
Tue Feb 7 18:25:20 UTC 2012
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 13:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Again, citing FHS:
> "Distributions may install software in /opt, but must not
> modify or delete software installed by the local system
> administrator without the assent of the local system
> administrator."
>
>
> How can this be interpreted as "non-OS vendor supplied"?
>
> This is one of many places in which FHS is vague but that's the common
> interpretation all distributions rely on
Um. Really? Wasn't there a distro - I'm thinking SUSE? - that installed
KDE in /opt for a long time?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
More information about the devel
mailing list