service iptables save, systemctl, and unhelpful error messages

[Reindl Harald]

Am 16.02.2012 00:48, schrieb Al Dunsmuir:
> On Wednesday, February 15, 2012, 6:12:44 PM, Reindl wrote:
>> this will not work since if a systemd-unit is present
>> systemd no longer is interested in anything from
>> /etc/init.d/
> 
>> so there is no solution except patch systemd if iptables.service is
>> called which will not happen because it would be unmaintainable
>> ober the long and doing it for iptables would bring a lot of
>> of other people complaining "but why not XXX whateverservice" too
> 
> Johann  has  spent  some significant time contributing to the last two
> Fedora releases, specifically a great deal of the actual conversion to
> systemd init.
> 
> I'm  sure  that  he  and  others  can get something functioning rather
> quickly  by  working  _with_  the  systemd developers. Even better, my
> experience is that both Johann and Lennart are fully capable of coming
> up  these  answers without filling everyone's days with bile and crass
> negativity.
> 
> Why  not  let  them have a chance, instead of insisting on using every
> opportunity to attempt to advance your own twisted viewpoint?

what is your exactly problem here?

well, wait their replies that they will not include all
sorts of exceptions for random services in systemd because
their target is holding systemd clean and compact to prvent
the need of the next init-system switch in few years

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120216/5a9db2be/attachment.sig>