systemd system unit files and UsrMove

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Fri Feb 17 18:31:58 UTC 2012


Le Ven 17 février 2012 18:40, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On 2012-02-17 10:28, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

>> Well, as we discussed the other day on IRC, we pretty much all agreed
>> that it's not in the spirit of the FHS to have these files in /lib
>> or /usr/lib. The only reason they were ever in /lib to begin with is
>> because /share didn't exist (and at the time we were (correctly)
>> positioning systemd as being prefix=/ and not prefix=/usr).
>
> That wasn't the impression I got. Some people at least seemed to be
> arguing that /usr/share was no more 'correct' for systemd unit files
> than /usr/lib/systemd is.

Trying to distinguish between code and data is a lost cause. arch independant
vs arch dependant is a clean simple boundary and the one fedora has
historically supported (look where lisp or java code is today)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot



More information about the devel mailing list