The question of rolling release?

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 01/24/2012 01:24 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:23:14AM +0000, mike cloaked wrote:
>> Fedora would appear to be out of line in not taking on board the
>> potential user base for a rolling release version.  For servers there
>> would be huge advantages in management of systems.
>
> I doubt your claims here.
>
> Fedora already has a perfectly good rolling release.  It's called
> Rawhide,  and I run it on my laptop.

Not quite. Rawhide is RH's and Fedora's rough, uncooked, unstable and 
experimental spear-head.

This has nothing in common with a "stable" and "properly packaged" 
rolling release.

Ralf