request for approval to upgrade asciidoc package

[Kevin Fenzi]

So, my thought would be: 

Definitely build in rawhide. A heads up to those that have packages
that build with it would be welcome. 

For stable releases I would suggest collecting a list of packages that
BuildRequire it and see how extensive this list is, and then consult
with those maintainers if they are ok with the upgrade. It may well not
be worth all the work or change in stable releases. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120727/d757452e/attachment.sig>