time to fix silly ssh bug

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 00:25 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:13:06 -0700
> Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> escribió:
> > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 18:16 -0600, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
> > > On 20/06/12 02:47 PM, Charles Zeitler wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Adam Williamson
> > > > <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote
> > > >>>
> > > >> I just tested a fresh install from F17 desktop live;
> > > >> the /home/user directory created after firstboot is
> > > >> 700. /home/user created by s-c-u is 700. /home/user created by
> > > >> useradd is 700. /home/user created by GNOME account tool is 700.
> > > >> So I can't recreate a 755 user dir in any way. --
> > > >> Adam Williamson
> > > >> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> > > >> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
> > > >> http://www.happyassassin.net
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > maybe you're not trying hard enough.
> > > > btw, kde install gave me a 755 ~, and a mix of modes on
> > > > sub-directories.
> > > 
> > > Bingo! Pattern found? I installed KDE as well, from DVD image.
> > 
> > It's possible, but seems odd. User accounts are created by firstboot,
> > always. It's the same code, whatever desktop you install and from
> > whatever media. There may be some kind of odd thing going on, but I
> > can't think what off the top of my head. I can poke it a bit more
> > tomorrow...
> 
> is firstboot using kwin4 when only kde is installed? and is that
> setting a non default umask?

That is one difference, yeah, firstboot uses native window managers.
I've no idea why a WM would set a umask, but it's possible, I guess.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net