Why we need redhat_lsb_trigger.c in redhat-lsb package?

[Bill Nottingham]

Niels de Vos (devos at fedoraproject.org) said: 
> >> %triggerpostun -p <lua> -- glibc
> >> LDSO = "/usr/lib/ld.so"
> >> LSBLDSO = "/usr/lib/ld." + LSB_VERSION + ".so"
> >> %ifarch ia64
> >> LDSO = "/emul/ia32-linux/lib" + LSBLDSO
> >> %fi
> >> posix.symlink(LDSO, LSBLDSO)
> >
> > That is not equivalent.  is_ia64 () is true in the statically linked
> > binary for %ifarch %{ix86} if running on the ia64 CPU (software emulated).
> 
> Aha, so is_ia64() does some checks and that makes the decision to have
> the symlink point to one ld.so or the other.
> If those checks can be written in lua, replacing redhat_lsb_trigger.c
> would make sense.

Well, it's not as if ia64 is supported in current Fedora or RHEL releases,
so those bits could just be removed...

Bill