ARM as a primary architecture

[Matthew Garrett]

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:09:22PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 03/20/2012 11:52 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
> 
> > In yesterday's FESCo meeting I told you I'd make a list of specific issues
> > I have with the current proposal for ARM as a primary archictecture. There
> > are some places where I think the current proposal fails to deal with some
> > necessary aspects of becoming a primary architecture, and some places where
> > I don't think the approach is quite right.  So without further ado:
> 
> Thanks for sending this. We were planning to start (and still are) a
> separate and broader thread once we've had time to circle back with a
> few folks in other groups for one-on-one feedback.

Is the plan for that to happen before next week's fesco meeting? If not 
we'll probably want to just defer it until we've made sure everyone's 
given feedback. I'd also like to see as much of the conversation take 
place in public as possible in order to make sure we can pick up the 
reasoning behind any decisions.

Thanks,
-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org