Broken dependencies: parcellite

[Christoph Wickert]

Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 18:30 +0100 schrieb Thomas Spura:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christoph Wickert
> <christoph.wickert at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 12:52 +0000 schrieb
> > buildsys at fedoraproject.org:
> >>
> >> parcellite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> >> On i386:
> >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
> >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
> >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
> >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
> >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
> >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
> >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libX11.so.6()(64bit)
> >> Please resolve this as soon as possible.
> >
> > I resolved this on March 10th with 1.0.2-0.2.rc5
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=306351
> > but still I keep getting these mails. Why? And why is the script
> > complaining about the F17 package when there is a F18 one in rawhide?
> 
> Looks like the script looks for fc17, but says it's rawhide...

Yeah, except that I get another mail for F17.

> (There are still broken deps in fc17, because your update is not yet stable:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3933/parcellite-1.0.2-0.2.rc5.fc17
> )

I was aware of the F17 update not yet being pushed. The funny (?) thing
is that the F17 mails stopped after the update was in testing, only
rawhide continues and I have no idea why.

Regards,
Christoph