httpd 2.4 is coming, RFC on module packaging draft

[Jon Ciesla]

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
<tibbs at math.uh.edu> wrote:
>>>>>> "JO" == Joe Orton <jorton at redhat.com> writes:
>
> JO> Yup - the default config in the f18 httpd does load
> JO> mod_access_compat, and I don't see a problem with shipping like
> JO> that.
>
> This is good news, because even if we convert the httpd.conf.d files in
> all of the packages, they're all marked %config(noreplace) so a package
> update won't magically fix
>
> JO> It would be good to convert webapps over for f18, having said that.
>
> It would be great to have a short document about this (even though I
> know the conversion is largely trivial).  Would it be reasonable to have
> something should be added to the packaging guidelines at some point so
> that new packages don't rely on the compatibility module?

Probably, and the release notes as well, if it's not already there.

-J

>  - J<
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie