Meeting minutes FESCo (2012-03-26)

[Adam Williamson]

On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:48 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 13:19 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Could I suggest that, if FESCo is going to have a different chair each
> >> > week, you at least have an SOP for arranging the meetings, so that this
> >> > kind of thing is done consistently?
> >>
> >> We do.
> >>
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FESCo_meeting_process
> >>
> >> > Just in the last two weeks we've had a FESCo meeting announcement with
> >> > an empty topic, and now a minutes post with a different subject from all
> >> > the previous minutes posts (the 'standard' appears to be "Summary &
> >> > minutes for today's FESCo meeting (XXXX-XX-XX)") and with no text but an
> >> > *attachment* of the meetbot summary.
> >> >
> >> > It looks rather unprofessional, to be honest.
> >>
> >> I suggest we all pay a bit better attention to it, including myself.
> >
> > Heh.
> >
> > The SOP does not, however, specify the correct topic for either email.
> > It provides a template for the 'announcement' mail, but no template for
> > the 'minutes' mail. It does not provide a link to an example of either
> > mail.
> 
> If you think this is a good example, I'll edit the page to fix those issues.
> 
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-March/163885.html

I'd probably pick one which doesn't have an extra 'note' in the subject.
Never underestimate the idiocy of crowds. ;)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net