Feature template update [was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule...]

[Garrett Holmstrom]

On 2012-11-05 12:22, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 07:52 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> A crit path update that affects, say, two packages and nothing else,
>> could be "approved by default" as well.  Many of the crit path
>> features however affect a large or extremely large package set (e.g.
>> the sysv->systemd script migration), in which case explicitly
>> involving every maintainer as the feature owner before even proposing
>> the feature wouldn't scale; that's where FESCo does need to step in as
>> a more efficient way to represent the large group of packagers.
>
> Case in point for F18 [1] and perfect example of one thing that should
> have been completed within one release cycle...
>
> JBG
>
>
> 1.http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PackagePresets

As that feature is about changing distribution-wide policy, I cannot act 
on it until said policy is written.  (See 
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/945)  The feature's owners do not 
appear to be interested in doing so.  If you are, I would greatly 
appreciate it if you would add a proposal to that FESCo ticket so I can 
have a clear path forward.