Keeping old versions of packages

[Reindl Harald]

Am 09.04.2013 17:02, schrieb Richard Hughes:
> On 9 April 2013 13:48, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>> if i want monthly pacthdays i use Microsoft or Oracle
> 
> Not at all. Patchdays make perfect sense for planning
> reboots/downtime/maintenance and that kind of thing.

there where i need this test-machines and internal repos exists
but i do NOT need anybody to hold back updates for me

>> you can hardly classify which bug is for which user critical!
> 
> Sure you can, Red Hat does it for updates in RHEL, and you just have
> to define what the terms mean. 90% of the updates I'm looking at right
> now for F18 are really not important at all. Spec file fixups, new
> versions without bugfixes, updated artwork; that can all wait until a
> certain point in the month

but Fedora IS NOT RHEL
if you want the RHEL way use it

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130411/40ac5b00/attachment.sig>