None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package

[Will Benton]

Sorry for any confusion, Jochen.  The next step in the process is notifying fedora-devel, which it appears we're doing now.

Jochen, would your preferred resolution be to be the primary maintainer (with one or more co-maintainers)?


best,
wb

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jochen Schmitt" <Jochen at herr-schmitt.de>
> To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2013 6:32:01 AM
> Subject: None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We have an open bug [1] becouse the primary mantainer of the scala
> package shows no response for open bugs.
> 
> Unfortunately, the original bug reporter seems to lost the inerest
> to finish the none-responsive maintainer process.
> 
> So I would like to ask, if it ok to reassign the bug to myself without
> start the whole none-responsive process at the beginnning.
> 
> Best Regards:
> 
> Jochen Schmitt
> 
> [1} orry fo
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct