Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

[Pavel Alexeev]

01.02.2013 00:17, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 14:20 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
>>
>>> I think that's not the point, one of the two suites will be dominant
>>> and you can't provide both of them on a live image for example.
>>> LibreOffice was introduced to our live images and we hit target 1GB,
>>> do you really think it could be useful having a larger image just
>>> because you want to provide both of the office suites?
>> The proposal explicitly says that it doesn't envisage including OO on
>> any images or in any default install configurations, simply adding it as
>> an option in the package repositories.
> Which doesn't really need a FESCo approval ... just a package review.
Meantime there one sentence which optionally require changes in 
LibreOffice too: " The /usr/bin/soffice alias is still a problem since 
(in the Fedora packages) it would conflict between LibreOffice and 
Apache OpenOffice: it is recommended to fix it in the LibreOffice 
packages too, at least using the Alternatives system."

I think it should be approved first if it really required.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130204/33ca3b96/attachment.html>