glpk soname bump expected?

[Orion Poplawski]

On 02/04/2013 09:13 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com> wrote:
>> Hmm, that makes it seem even more likely that upstream fat-fingered
>> something.
>>
>> Although: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/glpk.html
>> does indicate that ABI has been broken (although it has been done so in the
>> past without bumping the soname).
>
> Looks like this has been brought up on an upstream mailing list:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-glpk/2013-01/msg00081.html

Thanks, I've replied (hopefully).  So, while the bump was a big change, and 
while the maintainer perhaps didn't fully understand the ramifications of the 
ABI change, it was changed and a soname bump was appropriate.


-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder Office                  FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion at nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301                   http://www.nwra.com