Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

[Debarshi Ray]

>> <sarcasm>
>> So what is the next step? Offering another kernel? Or allowing us to choose
>> a different package manager or packing format? Oh, wait, using multiple
>> different depsolvers has already been frowned upon.
> 
> <deadpan>
> On an F18 system
> yum info smart
> yum info dpkg
> </deadpan>

You do know the difference between "frowned upon" and "banned", right?

For starters:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/669

If you dig you will atleast one more.
 
> Please don't confuse the discussion concerning "default" choices with
> a discussion as to what is allowable to include for end-users to
> choose from.

The point was to refute the "this is Fedora, so we want more choices"
argument.

Cheers,
Debarshi

-- 
If computers are going to revolutionize education, then steam engines and cars
and electricity would have done it too.  -- Arjun Shankar
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130208/ea27bde8/attachment.sig>