Proposed F19 Feature: Fedora Upgrade - using yum

[Reindl Harald]

Am 09.02.2013 15:52, schrieb drago01:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> oh even if people like i did some hundret dist-upgrades over the
>>> years it was us told that linux has to go the windows way:
>>>
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OfflineSystemUpdates
>>
>> Yeah, this is a really insane "feature"!
>>
>> Let me assure you that this "feature" is only currently implemented in
>> gnome-packagekit. The command-line tools will probably NEVER implement this.
>> As for Apper, I can assure you that:
>> * this "feature" is not currently implemented in Apper,
>> * Apper's upstream author plans to support it in the future, but make it
>> optional, and
>> * KDE SIG has strong reservations about the usefulness and desirability of
>> this "feature" and it will likely end up disabled by default in Fedora if
>> implemented.
> 
> Yes become ignoring problems by pretending that they do not exist is
> the way to go ....

why preklink not banned which also touches probably running
binaries, but hey in this case it is OK because it was a
fedora feature years ago and there must be good

which problems?
where were they over decades?
who did introduce them recently?
why this bugs are not fixed?



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130209/274c3059/attachment.sig>