Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

[Adam Williamson]

On 19/02/13 10:38 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 11:43 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 07:13:27AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
>>
>>   > I have a script that automates some of the workload of reassigning the
>>   > component back to where the bug really is, but it currently requires
>>   > some manual intervention:
>>   > http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/dmalcolm/public_git/triage.git
>>   > so inevitably I don't run it on every bug that comes in every day, and
>>   > so I gradually get behind.
>>
>> That looks useful. It's made of special-cases of course for your
>> use-case, but I think we can come up with some similar rules for common
>> things we see reported against the kernel.
> I've tried to hide the bulk of the python-specificness within rules.py
> (though there are some helper methods in backtrace.py for extracting
> python-level backtraces from a C-level backtrace).
>
> So if you want to hack this into a tool for use on kernel bugs, go for
> it.

...and please integrate with abrt! Let's have it all working together :)

Didn't there used to be a kernel.org trace server-y thing before 
linux.org got hacked? Has that ever come back up again? I recall abrt 
was sending kernel traces there instead of to BZ at the time.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net