comps' "standard" group spring cleaning?

[Matthew Miller]

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:47:40PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
> And while I agree the goal to be POSIX compliant is nice, as far as i
> know, we are not, so we do not claim to be. ( ie, people cannot and
> should not expect the system to have theses utilities by default ).

Yeah, but it's reasonable for people to expect that scripts using standard
commands which have always worked on Fedora to continue to work on Fedora
unless there's a good reason for them to not. That doesn't mean we need to
carry cruft for ever, but we should error on the side of compatibly in the
absence of a reason. (And I think "saving 120k in non-minimal installs"
doesn't count.)


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>