Getting rid of systemd-sysv-convert?
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Thu Jun 20 23:05:49 UTC 2013
Reindl Harald (h.reindl at thelounge.net) said:
> yes - why was such a basic service *not* a systemd-unit
> at the F15 release-day?
Because it's not a service in the traditional sense at all. To
move it to systemd requires one of:
- adding a minimum wrapper that just execs the same pile of shell, which
gains you conversion for conversion's sake
- building a generator that creates ifup@<config>.service entries which
are then pulled into a network.target or similar... which then means
that you get a *vastly* different service profile for the network
script than when using NM, and is a large new paradigm for a service
that's not the default.
Bill
More information about the devel
mailing list