RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 18:31:06 -0800
Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:

> We do already have an AutoQA test which runs rpmguard, and rpmguard 
> notes dependency/provision version changes. Here it is spotting an
> ABI bump for binutils:
> 
> http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/531743-autotest/qa02.qa/rpmguard/results/binutils-2.23.52.0.1.html
> 
> Now, whether you'd want to somehow parse such results out from the 
> existing rpmguard test externally, or write a new more specific test,
> or do something else, or dance a little jig, is a different question.
> But to a certain extent we're Already Doing That. The rpmguard test
> is currently entirely informational, no policies are enforced, but
> you can go read the output if you want to be an informed package
> maintainer...

Sure. Note however that we don't currently run autoqa on rawhide builds
and that was at least the initial target for this. ;) 

But yeah, good test to know... 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130306/26e106cf/attachment.sig>