Unhelpful update descriptions

[Dan Mashal]

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Mathieu Bridon
<bochecha at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 15:14 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> 在 2013-3-12 PM3:03，"Tomasz Torcz" <tomek at pipebreaker.pl>写道：
>>
>> >   This sounds like updates that SHOULDN'T be pushed. If update has no
>> > changes worth mentioning, it is trivial - trivial updates should not be
>> pushed.
>>
>> If upstream release a minor bug fix version, what should we do?
>>
>>
>> 在 2013-3-12 PM3:03，"Tomasz Torcz" <tomek at pipebreaker.pl>写道：
>>
>> >   This sounds like updates that SHOULDN'T be pushed. If update has
>> no
>> > changes worth mentioning, it is trivial - trivial updates should not
>> be pushed.
>>
>> If upstream release a minor bug fix version, what should we do?
>
> Then the update is not trivial, and you know what to put in the update
> notes: just talk about this bug fix.
>
>
> --
> Mathieu
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Forget it. There is such a double standard here and exceptions to many
rules. This is a worthless conversation.

Good on ya if you put in the extra effort.

Dan