Packages requires /sbin/service.

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Sun Mar 17 16:31:11 UTC 2013



Am 17.03.2013 17:12, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Sáb, 2013-03-16 at 19:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: 
>>
>> Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter:
>>> Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
>>>
>>>> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. 
>>>
>>> That's not necessarily true.  Do our packaging guidelines actually say that 
>>> anywhere?
>>
>> but WHY are they not saying it clearly?
>> until now UsrMove is a half-baken thing
> 
> No, with UsrMove you have symbol links
> ll / 
> bin -> usr/bin
> lib -> usr/lib
> lib64 -> usr/lib64
> sbin -> usr/sbin
> 
> I'm not sure, but I'd say, you must have the symbol links

and hwat does this change on the fact that the real location
is /usr/sbin/service and /usr/bin/bash

>> see below - what the hell, /usr/bin/bash is a valid shell
>>
>> [root at fileserver:~]$ system-config-users
>> The value for the SHELL variable was not found the /etc/shells file
>> This incident has been reported
>>
>> [root at fileserver:~]$ cat /etc/shells
>> /bin/sh
>> /bin/bash
>> /sbin/nologin
>>
>> [root at fileserver:~]$ cat /etc/passwd | grep root
>> root:x:0:0:root:/root:/usr/bin/bash

and if both are valid both have to be valid as shell
in ANY context or anything changed to the physical location

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130317/c322fd2f/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list