package, package2, package3 naming-with-version exploit

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 29.3.2013 15:51, Jan Zelený napsal(a):
> On 29. 3. 2013 at 14:38:49, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 29.3.2013 13:28, Jan Zelený napsal(a):
>>> But the point I was making is that the technical solution of multiversion
>>> packaging has a potential to bring such a mess in spec files that they
>>> become unmaintanable and therefore the solution would be practically
>>> useless.
>> Any example here? Could you show us some example .spec files, to
>> illustrate your point, please?
> No need to go far for that. I think that the solution proposed in the very
> first email of this thread is the best illustration you can have at this moment
> and I also think Florian described well what are the issues it brings for
> maintainers.
>
> Thanks
> Jan

I could live with that one line, if it will remove the mangled package 
name. So please, show me example to let me understand your point.


Vít