FPC elections

[Josh Boyer]

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> wrote:
> Dne 14.5.2013 20:46, Josh Boyer napsal(a):
>>>
>>> Heck the community did not have the faintest idea which tickets they even
>>> worked ( or did any work at all )  on until I literally request they
>>> adopted
>>> the fesco model so we atleast could get a faint idea what was going to be
>>> discussed on those meeting...
>>
>> Sounds like working with them has paid off nicely.  Maybe you should
>> do more of that.
>>
>>> Let's just continue to cross finger hope that those that have been chosen
>>> <-- yeah that's right not elected but chosen bother to show up to do
>>> their
>>> due diligence and reach a quorum.
>>
>> The elections are open, and the voting is not rigged.  You can be
>> displeased all you like about who gets elected and what they choose
>> (or not choose) to look at, but that doesn't make those committees a
>> farce.
>
>
> This complaint was about FPC and you are unfortunately wrong about that:
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2013-April/009068.html
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-May/001147.html
>
> There is nothing like open election to FPC.

Ah.  I thought he was referring to FESCo and being hyperbolic.

josh