Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

[Mateusz Marzantowicz]

On 04.11.2013 21:03, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 04.11.2013 20:56, schrieb drago01:
>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>>>> that's all true but you can be pretty sure if a "app-store" with
>>>> bundeled applications exists *nobody* would package and maintain
>>>> them as RPM -> everybody would point with his finger to the app
>>>
>>> No because RPM packages apps *do* have benifits .. otherwise we
>>> wouldn't have this discussion.
>>>
>>>> if it goes in that direction, and it starts faster than anybody likes
>>>> you do a dramatical harm to the userbase which likes the consistent
>>>> package managment and *really used* conecpt of shared libraries
>>>
>>> Again those are NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. You can have sandboxed *and*
>>> rpm packaged apps at the same time.
>>
>> the most imporant word in your answer is *CAN*
>>
>> but you will not, nobody will package whatever application
>> as RPM if he is fine with the app-store, so you *could*
>> have both but i doubt at the end of the day it will happen
> 
> And I disagree ... but there is a way to find out ... lets try and see ;)
> 

After all there are other Linux distributions, so let's see if Fedora
survives this experiment. ;-)



Mateusz Marzantowicz