debuginfo packages available in updates later than regular packages.

Sandro Mani manisandro at gmail.com
Tue Nov 26 11:05:56 UTC 2013


On 26.11.2013 11:50, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Mar 26 novembre 2013 03:55, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
>> Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>>> There were multiple Bugs suggesting the same, they are linked together
>>> for
>>> example from this one from 2005.  But it all got WONTFIXed:
>>> Debug info RPMs do not "require" exact maching binary rpm
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=151598
>> The problem with those dependencies is that -debuginfo covers all the
>> subpackages, so which one should it require? All of them? That's more
>> often
>> than not NOT what I want.
> Just conflict with all subpackages that do not match the exact debuginfo
> version
>
> Regards,
>
Is there some rpm macro magic to list all the (sub)packages defined in a 
spec?

Sandro


More information about the devel mailing list