[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

[Sergio Pascual]

Hello

2014-07-21 10:59 GMT+02:00 Christopher Meng <cickumqt at gmail.com>:

> I just want to ask here, why did you retire the pywcs and considered
> it as dead upstream whereas pypi pywcs has a new release in the
> February?
>

The functionallity of pywcs is now in astropy, is where active development
is happening. The API is the same. Sometimes the developers backport the
code to pywcs, but is a dead end.


> And now APLpy is broken.
>

I contacted the maintainer before the change and he agreed to update to
APLpy 0.9.11 that uses astropy instead of pywcs. He hasn't updated yet.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116895

In this report there is a new specfile for APLpy 0.9.11. I would have
updated myself but I'm not a proven packager.

Regards



> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140721/c1c5d060/attachment-0001.html>