downgrade version of gthumb in fedora 21 final?

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 08:52 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 7 November 2014 00:31, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro at gnome.org> wrote:
> > Since gthumb does not follow the GNOME release schedule, we
> > shouldn't push unstable versions of gthumb to rawhide.
> 
> No? We push unstable GNOME to rawhide all the time; or is this more of
> a case where we're worrying that a stable gthumb won't be available
> before F22 is due?


The original email was talking about F21. Seems pretty unlikely that it
will happen in time, so we need a downgrade (and epoch bump)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20141107/3ce11489/attachment.sig>