DNF as default package manager

[Peter Robinson]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> wrote:
> Dne 21.1.2015 v 12:34 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
>> Are we expected to cross referencing previous logs to see if there's
>> changes or if it's the same and provide you that information? We
>> already have too much to do so it's easier to stick with yum where we
>> know what the outcome is. Sorry, not going to do your work for you! Peter
>
> I'd expect that if we are speaking about DNF as default (and it was
> approved by FESCo), that releng do scratch mass rebuild of all these 18k
> packages built using DNF and give us list of failed packages. What are
> these failures is not your concern but package maintainers concern.

If they build with yum why is it a bug in the packaging? You say that
it's a packaging problem but you've not given examples of the issues
in packaging that cause issues with dnf but not yum. Sounds like a
regression in dnf to me.

Peter