Bodhi policy for pushing updates to stable
Adam Williamson
adamwill at fedoraproject.org
Sat Jan 24 19:21:38 UTC 2015
On Sat, 2015-01-24 at 11:05 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> With a change along those lines, I think we could plausibly look at
> hard enforcement of the upgrade path, and it would be a good
> improvement. It may be necessary to have *some* kind of override
> mechanism for the case where we have a major security issue we
> really need to fix in stable ASAP, and karma for Branched is lagging
> behind.
I should also note for completeness the other string to this debate:
https://github.com/wgwoods/fedup/issues/21
that would make the upgradepath issue more or less moot, as you can
already use --distro-sync for yum/dnf upgrades.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
More information about the devel
mailing list